The Large Hadron Collider experiment at the European Council for Nuclear Research (CERN), the most expensive peaceful experiment of history, has lost its scientific justification after two of its 3 raisons d’etre are gone. Specifically, the two reasons for its design mentioned in the title can no longer be searched for now that the new statistical-mechanical discipline of cryodynamics has demonstrated their nonexistence [1].

The third major reason for the operation of the LHC experiment — the attempt to create artificial miniature black holes and to study their Hawking evaporation — ceased to make scientific sense 3 years ago when two papers implying the non-existence of Hawking radiation were published [2,3].

However, at the same time the probability of a success of the experiment regarding the production of miniature black holes got a large boost. This is a bit embarrassing in view of the fact that this success cannot possibly be detected by the outdated sensors CERN installed [3]. Thus the experiment ceases to be a scientific experiment when started defiantly (as this later happened).

However, would its success (to be made about twice as likely during the present month’s experiments [4]) not represent a major advance even if this success can become manifest only in about 5 years’ time [3]? The answer is a sounding yes: a few scientists will then rejoice. But so not in public and so not for long because shortly thereafter, the planet will be absorbed into a 2-cm black hole. “Panbiocide” is the technical term (C.A. Hilgartner).

But this must be a joke? So far, this danger [3] while going unquoted by CERN remains unfalsified. The whole planet therefore merrily intones “Oh you dear Augustin CERN” to Marx Augustin’s original melody of 1679 [5].

References

[1] O.E. Rossler and F. Kuske, “Cryodynamics — The new second thermodynamics demonstrated numerically,” AIP Conf. Proc. 1389, 959-961 (2011). http://link.aip.org/link/?APCPCS/1389/959/1

[2] O.E. Rossler, “Abraham-solution to Schwarzschild metric implies that CERN miniblack holes pose a planetary risk,” in: Vernetzte Wissenschaften – Crosslinks in Natural and Social Sciences (eds. P.J. Plath and E.C. Hass), pp. 263-270. Berlin: Logos Verlag, July 2008. http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/ottoroesslerminiblackhole.pdf

[3] O.E. Rossler, “A rational and moral and spiritual dilemma,” in: Personal and Spiritual Development in the World of Cultural Diversity, Vol. 5 (eds. G.E. Lasker and K. Hiwaki). Tecumseh: The International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics, July 2008. http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/spiritualottoeroessler.pdf

[4] A. Rydd and M. Ferro-Luzzi, “Experiment’s desiderata,” slide No. 8, http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=1&sess.….fId=144632

[5] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqqtR-yBKqE&feature=youtu.be
(More cultural: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLdwTtdl2cQ)